Revise and resubmit? Or conditional accept?

Marian Iszatt-White

Business History, 2024, vol. 66, issue 4, 796-798

Abstract: This brief comment is a response to the BH Editors timely editorial concerning the issues surrounding peer review. Building on their work, it discusses reviewer education, reviewer recruitment, and the role of associate editors/editors-in-chief. From these perspectives, it suggests ways in which we might prop up the current system – currently creaking under the demands made of it – rather than do away with it in favour of some elusive alterative. It concludes by raising the related issue of what constitutes a ‘contribution’ and suggests a future editorial might look beyond theoretical contributions as the ’holy grail’ of academic publishing.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2024.2343873 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:bushst:v:66:y:2024:i:4:p:796-798

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/FBSH20

DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2024.2343873

Access Statistics for this article

Business History is currently edited by Professor John Wilson and Professor Steven Toms

More articles in Business History from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().