Organizational learning in novel policy situations: two cases of United States communications regulation

Michael Zarkin

Policy Studies, 2008, vol. 29, issue 1, 87-100

Abstract: During the last three and a half decades, a growing body of scholarship has characterized policy-making as a process of ‘learning’. Recent scholarship has further suggested that a more narrow focus on organizational learning – learning within specific types of governing bodies – might provide greater analytical and methodological precision. While scholars of organizational learning disagree about some of the specifics, most agree that organizations learn when they successfully acquire and use knowledge to alter policy outputs, worldviews, or both. Thus, a major goal of recent learning scholarship has been to better understand the factors that shape knowledge acquisition and utilization under a variety of circumstances. The purpose of this article is to build on the literature by further clarifying the factors that facilitate organizational learning under conditions of policy novelty and scientific uncertainty. It is argued that three principal factors – analogical reasoning, knowledge acquisition strategies, and mental frames – interact to determine whether or not organizations can learn in such situations. A series of theoretical propositions relating to these factors are outlined and then applied to two contrasting cases of US communications regulation.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442870701848095 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:29:y:2008:i:1:p:87-100

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/cpos20

DOI: 10.1080/01442870701848095

Access Statistics for this article

Policy Studies is currently edited by Toby James

More articles in Policy Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().