Mainstream Economics' Flight from Complexity
Hendrik Van den Berg
Forum for Social Economics, 2018, vol. 47, issue 1, 8-31
Abstract:
By the late 1800s, Walras' mathematical model of a market system and Marshall's detailed description of individual markets captured the thought processes of most economists, and since then the quest for mathematical precision and the emphasis on mechanics over realism have further narrowed the scope of economic analysis. This paper examines several specific cases where overly simplistic and unrealistic models dominate despite evidence that the real world is more complex and fundamentally different from what the models suggest. For example, macroeconomists simplify their analysis by requiring mathematically tractable microfoundations of macroeconomic outcomes. Econometric practice has shifted toward single equation estimation models and away from systems of equations, often arbitrarily using instrumental variables to isolate simple relationships from systemic influences. Even economic growth theory uses static aggregate equilibrium models to explain inherently complex dynamic relationships. Among the probable causes of mainstream economics' retreat from real world complexity is the power of culture, which pushes economists to close ranks around unrealistic paradigms. These tendencies are reinforced by the active urging of wealthy interests who protect their privilege in the status quo of monopoly capitalism. The paper concludes with a call for heterodox economists to actively push our field out of its unrealistic and unproductive methodological box by undertaking all economic analysis from a holistic perspective and clearly positioning economic discussions and issues in the interconnected economic/social/natural spheres of human existence. In short, heterodox economists must undertake the difficult task of pushing our profession to respect and appreciate complexity.
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07360932.2015.1028085 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:47:y:2018:i:1:p:8-31
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RFSE20
DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2015.1028085
Access Statistics for this article
Forum for Social Economics is currently edited by William Milberg, Dr Wolfram Elsner, Philip O'Hara, Cecilia Winters and Paolo Ramazzotti
More articles in Forum for Social Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().