Secrecy and Self-Interest: When Mediators Act Deceitfully
Babak RezaeeDaryakenari and
Cameron G. Thies
International Interactions, 2018, vol. 44, issue 4, 603-630
Abstract:
3rd party intervention in interstate conflict is a common strategy for mitigating conflict and obtaining a final agreement. However, not all mediations are successful, leading to the development of a rich literature on the mechanisms which decrease the probability of failure in a 3rd-party intervention. Within this literature, some studies examine how a mediator’ behavior and incentives affect the result of the mediation. Virtually all these studies assume that the mediator is virtuous such that peace is the most desired outcome of a conflict for her. However, this study challenges this assumption and contends that a mediator can gain benefit from the conflict between disputants. If this benefit is adequately large to overcome the benefits of peace, then the mediator has enough incentive not to conduct the mediation toward a peaceful outcome. We develop a signaling game model to study this issue formally and test the proposed hypothesis empirically.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050629.2018.1406931 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:44:y:2018:i:4:p:603-630
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/GINI20
DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2018.1406931
Access Statistics for this article
International Interactions is currently edited by Michael Colaresi and Gerald Schneider
More articles in International Interactions from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().