Quantifying women’s rights naming and shaming: A novel text-as-data approach
Yuan Zhou,
Ghashia Kiyani and
Charles Crabtree
International Interactions, 2025, vol. 51, issue 4, 689-707
Abstract:
This research note introduces a novel methodology for quantifying naming and shaming practices in the context of women’s rights, utilizing a corpus of 10,760 human rights reports from the US State Department and Amnesty International. By applying latent semantic scaling, a semi-supervised text analysis technique, we develop a cross-national metric to assess the intensity of naming and shaming on women’s rights. The approach aims to complement existing measurement by focusing on the shaming actions of prominent international human rights players. Our illustrative analysis shows that naming and shaming can influence women’s rights differently across various regime types, showing notable effectiveness in autocratic regimes, particularly in personalist ones. This contribution significantly advances methodological capabilities in human rights research, opening up new possibilities for quantitatively assessing the influence of international advocacy on women’s rights.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050629.2025.2509971 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:51:y:2025:i:4:p:689-707
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/GINI20
DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2025.2509971
Access Statistics for this article
International Interactions is currently edited by Michael Colaresi and Gerald Schneider
More articles in International Interactions from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().