EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Searching wide or staying close: the relative use of distinct organisational learning types in high and low novelty innovations

Russell Seidle

Industry and Innovation, 2024, vol. 31, issue 9, 1101-1140

Abstract: Despite the acknowledged importance of organisational learning for new product development, there is a dearth of research into the relative use of distinct learning types as the innovation process unfolds. Our paper more fully engages with this issue, contrasting innovations of high versus low technological novelty. A qualitative study of innovation projects in the biopharmaceutical and medical device industries reveals that learning patterns vary in significant ways throughout the innovation process based on the underlying technological novelty of the offering. High novelty projects begin with an emphasis on vicarious learning from distant referents and shift to more internal experiential learning over time. Meanwhile, low novelty projects begin with experiential learning, pursue vicarious learning from proximate (industry peer) referents, and finish by returning to internal experience. We theorise a more general sequence of learning types throughout the innovation process based on our findings.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2024.2328001 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:indinn:v:31:y:2024:i:9:p:1101-1140

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CIAI20

DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2024.2328001

Access Statistics for this article

Industry and Innovation is currently edited by Associate Professor Mark Lorenzen

More articles in Industry and Innovation from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:31:y:2024:i:9:p:1101-1140