EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Preferences of retail investors and institutions for corporate social performance

Michel T. J. Rakotomavo

Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2011, vol. 1, issue 2, 93-102

Abstract: I examine the preference of investors for corporate social performance (CSP). The evidence suggests that retail stock investors tend to be attracted to companies that have CSP strengths in community, employee relations, corporate governance and human rights. As a group, institutions tend to express their CSP preference through negative screening. Aggregate institutional holdings are not positively associated with CSP strengths, but are negatively associated with CSP weaknesses in diversity, environment, human rights and product. The negative screens used by most types of institutions focus on diversity and human rights. The holdings of specific institutional types such as banks, investment companies and pension funds are positively correlated with various CSP strengths, while those of insurance companies and investment advisors are not.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20430795.2011.582322 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:93-102

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/TSFI20

DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2011.582322

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment is currently edited by Dr Matthew Haigh

More articles in Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:93-102