Assessing Uncertainty in Support-Adjusted Spatial Misalignment Problems

Linda J. Young, Carol A. Gotway, Greg Kearney and Chris DuClos

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2009, vol. 38, issue 16-17, 3249-3264

Abstract: Existing data from multiple sources (e.g., surveillance systems, health registries, governmental agencies) are the foundation for analysis and inference in many studies and programs. More often than not, these data have been collected on different geographical or spatial units, and each of these may be different from the ones of interest. Numerous statistical issues are associated with combining such disparate data. Florida's efforts to move toward implementation of The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Environmental Public Health Tracking (EPHT) Program aptly illustrate these issues, which are typical of almost any study designed to measure the association between environmental hazards and health outcomes. In this article, we consider the inferential issues that arise when a potential explanatory variable is measured on one set of spatial units, but then must be predicted on a different set of spatial units. We compare the results from two different approaches to linking health and environmental data on different spatial units, focusing on the need to account for spatial scale and the support of spatial data in the analysis. We compare methods for assessing uncertainty and the potential bias that arises from using predicted variables in spatial regression models. Our focus is on relatively simple methods and concepts that can be transferred to the states' departments of health, the organizations responsible for implementing EPHT.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610920902947816 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:38:y:2009:i:16-17:p:3249-3264

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/lsta20

DOI: 10.1080/03610920902947816

Access Statistics for this article

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods is currently edited by Debbie Iscoe

More articles in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().