Responding to the populist attack on public administration

David Arellano-Gault

Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 2020, vol. 42, issue 1, 6-8

Abstract: The current wave of populism, either from the left or the right, has a particularly strong and negative view of public administration, both seen as body of knowledge and as a governmental apparatus. In short, populist defend that public administration has become actually a defendant of the elites, a technocracy serving elitist interests. Public administration uses its technocratic jargon to hide from its only and simple responsibility: to resolve the people’s problems, which is assumed to be homogenous and different from the “elites”. The populist solution for an effective government of forcing a general agreement under the idea of homogenous “people’s needs” is not only misleading but also dangerous. Dangerous because accepting the importance of plurality has shown to be critical for protecting the always weak institutional framework that guards the liberty and rights of persons in any society.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23276665.2020.1733854 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:42:y:2020:i:1:p:6-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAPA20

DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2020.1733854

Access Statistics for this article

Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration is currently edited by Ian Thynne and Danny Lam

More articles in Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().