Participatory budgeting and political representation in China

Emilie Frenkiel

Journal of Chinese Governance, 2021, vol. 6, issue 1, 58-80

Abstract: In this paper I conduct a comparative analysis of three Chinese experiments with participatory budgeting (PB), a democratic innovation that has circulated worldwide. Relying on a renewed typology of political representation and ethnographic fieldwork combined with official data collection in Chengdu, Sichuan and Wenling, Zhejiang over seven years, it investigates the expansion and practice of PB and analyzes the relationship between participation and representation. It asserts that in the Chinese context PB cannot be simply reduced to empowering civil society against established representatives or becoming an instrument of legitimization for established elites. In the three investigated cases—which are not representative of Chinese local politics—PB does contribute to opening the decision-making process to formerly excluded participants, who are nonetheless not exactly ordinary citizens but rather local elites and “super residents” bridging the gap between established elites and residents.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2020.1731944 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:58-80

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rgov20

DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2020.1731944

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Chinese Governance is currently edited by Sujian Guo

More articles in Journal of Chinese Governance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().