Hedging and Reserving for Single-Premium Segregated Fund Contracts

Mary Hardy

North American Actuarial Journal, 2000, vol. 4, issue 2, 63-74

Abstract: Three methods for determining suitable provision for maturity guarantees for single-premium segregated fund contracts are compared. Actuarial reserving assumes funds are held in risk-free assets, to give a prescribed probability of meeting the guarantee liability. Dynamic hedging uses the Black-Scholes framework to determine the replicating portfolio. Static hedging assumes a counterparty is willing to sell the options required to meet the guarantee. Using a stochastic cash flow projection, we consider how to assess which approach is most profitable. The example given assumes a typical Canadian segregated fund contract.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2000.10595903 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:4:y:2000:i:2:p:63-74

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/uaaj20

DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2000.10595903

Access Statistics for this article

North American Actuarial Journal is currently edited by Kathryn Baker

More articles in North American Actuarial Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().