Comparing International Market Selection Methods Using Export Potential Values for South Africa

Mariska Aucamp, Ermie Annelies Steenkamp and Carli Bezuidenhout

The International Trade Journal, 2025, vol. 39, issue 1, 55-77

Abstract: Resources for export promotion are scarce, and incorrect market selection can be costly. In the literature, the gravity model, International Trade Center’s Export Potential Map, and decision support model all estimate export potential values. Although the same concept is measured, different methodologies are used. This study aimed to compare the rankings assigned to the export potential values by each approach. The results indicated that 45% of the rankings differed by more than five places, while one-third were ranked in the top 10 of only one approach. Given these inconsistencies, alternative approaches for prioritization after identifying export opportunities are recommended.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08853908.2023.2166628 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:uitjxx:v:39:y:2025:i:1:p:55-77

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/uitj20

DOI: 10.1080/08853908.2023.2166628

Access Statistics for this article

The International Trade Journal is currently edited by George R. G. Clarke

More articles in The International Trade Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().