Identifying prominent actors in historical networks: The case of the New Education movement

Lauri Luoto

Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 2025, vol. 58, issue 1, 17-30

Abstract: Social network analysis is becoming increasingly popular for studying the past. However, during the last decades, studies have applied pre-collected datasets for social network analysis, which limits the use of the method to cases where such data is available. This article presents another approach whereby two-mode network data are collected from less structured documentary sources, and the findings are enriched with documentary evidence. The approach is used to analyze how 42 notable members of the British New Education movement between 1905 and 1935 were affiliated with 31 organizations. The analysis provides empirical support for the previously proposed idea that there were two kinds of prominence within the movement: that of conveners, who formed close-knit groups with like-minded people, and that of mediators, who built bridges between such groups. Moreover, we discuss how this structure helped the movement to achieve its goals of more up-to-date, equally available education. The method presented in the article is suitable for researchers working with bibliographical or archive material in various domains.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01615440.2024.2431487 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:vhimxx:v:58:y:2025:i:1:p:17-30

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/vhim20

DOI: 10.1080/01615440.2024.2431487

Access Statistics for this article

Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History is currently edited by J. David Hacker and Kenneth Sylvester

More articles in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().