Bidding on Price and Quality: An Experiment on the Complexity of Scoring Rule Auctions
Riccardo Camboni,
Luca Corazzini,
Stefano Galavotti and
Paola Valbonesi
Additional contact information
Riccardo Camboni: University of Padova
Luca Corazzini: University of Milan-Bicocca; Masaryk University Experimental Economics Laboratory
Stefano Galavotti: University of Bari
Paola Valbonesi: University of Padova
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2025, vol. 107, issue 3, 755-770
Abstract:
We experimentally study procurement auctions when both quality and price matter. We compare two treatments where sellers compete on one dimension only (price or quality), with three treatments where sellers submit a price-quality bid and the winner is determined by a scoring rule that combines the two offers. We find that, in the scoring rule treatments, efficiency and buyer’s utility are lower than predicted. Estimates from a Quantal Response Equilibrium model suggest that increasing the dimension of the strategy space imposes a complexity burden on sellers, so that a simpler mechanism like a quality-only auction may be preferable.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01288
Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:107:y:2025:i:3:p:755-770
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu
More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().