Tax Avoidance And The Deadweight Loss Of The Income Tax

Martin Feldstein

The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1999, vol. 81, issue 4, 674-680

Abstract: Traditional analyses of the income tax greatly underestimate deadweight losses by ignoring its effect on forms of compensation and patterns of consumption. The full deadweight loss is easily calculated using the compensated elasticity of taxable income to changes in tax rates because leisure, excludable income, and deductible consumption are a Hicksian composite good. Microeconomic estimates imply a deadweight loss of as much as 30% of revenue or more than ten times Harberger's classic 1964 estimate. The relative deadweight loss caused by increasing existing tax rates is substantially greater and may exceed $2 per $1 of revenue. © 2000 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (504)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/003465399558391 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Tax Avoidance and the Deadweight Loss of the Income Tax (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:81:y:1999:i:4:p:674-680

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu

More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().