Researching Lean: Methodological Implications of Loose Definitions

Mikael Brännmark, Jostein Langstrand, Stina Johansson, Agneta Halvarsson, Lena Abrahamsson and Jörgen Winkel

Quality Innovation Prosperity, 2012, vol. 16, issue 2

Abstract: Recently, Lean Production (Lean) has become a prevailing management concept in Sweden. However, previous research seems to show that the Lean concept and the impact of Lean vary considerably between organizations. This paper illustrates some key methodological issues that need to be considered when researching loosely defined management concepts such as Lean. The paper is based on a review of the literature and five comparative Swedish cases studies. Our study indicates that Lean has changed over time and that operationalization and interpretations of the concept vary considerably. This study concludes that future Lean studies should include a thorough assessment of the Lean interventions, study settings, and in particular non-Lean factors mediating the outcomes of Lean-inspired change programs.

Keywords: Validity; mediating factors; contextual factors; Lean impact; study design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.qip-journal.eu/index.php/QIP/article/download/67/46 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tuk:qipqip:v:16:y:2012:i:2:3

Access Statistics for this article

Quality Innovation Prosperity is currently edited by Kristina Zgodavova

More articles in Quality Innovation Prosperity from Technical University of Košice, Department of integrated management
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Bober ().