Non-Violent Opposition to Peace Processes: Northern Ireland's Serial Spoilers

Christopher Farrington
Additional contact information
Christopher Farrington: School of Politics and International Relations, University College Dublin

No 200605, Working Papers from Geary Institute, University College Dublin

Abstract: This articleargues the crucialstage to the success or failure of a peace agreement is the implementation stagebecause it is at this stagethat the agreement becomes subject to politicalforces which havenot been involved in the negotiation process.It builds on Frensley’sresearch (1998)that the post-negotiation ratification process is a determinant of the success of failure of an agreement bypositinga more dynamic theory.Itargues that the roleof elites in shapingthe preferences of their constituencyneeds to be factored into the analysis of the ratification process and that the position of parties in a democratic frameworkis important in shapingtheir strategies.It builds on Stedman’sresearch on spoilers to argue that non-violent democratic spoilers pose a particular difficultyfor peace agreements and uses evidence from Northern Ireland to show how non-violent spoilers have been the main determinant for the failure of both the Belfast Agreement of 1998and the Sunningdaleexperiment of 1973– 4.

Pages: 19 pages
Date: 2006-02-28
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ucd.ie/geary/static/publications/workingpapers/GearyWp200605.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucd:wpaper:200605

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Geary Institute, University College Dublin Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Geary Tech ().