Contractual Remedies in Mergers

Dhruv Aggarwal, Albert H. Choi and Geeyoung Min

Journal of Law and Economics, 2026, vol. 69, issue 4, 789 - 823

Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of a recent Delaware corporate law decision that restricted a merger target’s ability to recover damages from a breaching buyer. First, we provide a theoretical analysis to generate empirical predictions. Second, we show that the decision led to a decrease in both target and joint values in mergers governed by Delaware law. Third, we hand collect relevant provisions from merger agreements and find that deals governed by Delaware law include more target-friendly nonprice terms after the decision. We also provide evidence suggesting that transactions governed by Delaware law that adopted such nonprice contract terms experienced a relative decrease in deal price. Overall, the paper demonstrates the importance of remedy provisions in merger contracting and shows how contracting parties respond to an exogenous change in jurisprudence on deals.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/744288 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/744288 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/744288

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Law and Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().