Risk and Return of Industrial Development Bonds

Diane Coogan-Pushner and Josh Keller

Municipal Finance Journal, 2016, vol. 37, issue 2, 73 - 91

Abstract: This study examines default and recovery performance of industrial development bonds (IDBs) and evaluates whether investors have been adequately compensated for the default experience they assumed by investing in these bonds. Characterized by high default rates, IDBs experienced a turnaround after the Tax Reform Act of 1986, as found by Fitch Ratings studies in 1999 and 2003. This study, which covers the universe of IDBs, updates the 2003 Fitch study with a decade’s worth of new IDB issues to observe and with an extension of the horizon of the bonds in Fitch’s study to 25 years. It finds that the sector’s default rate improvement persisted throughout the observation period. It also finds that IDBs paid large tax equivalent yield spreads relative to U.S. Treasuries. The authors examine whether these spreads were adequate to compensate investors for the bonds’ default experience and for other risks inherent in municipal bonds.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ37020073 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ37020073 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj37020073

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Municipal Finance Journal from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().