Estimation and Testing of Forecast Rationality with Many Moments
Tae-Hwy Lee () and
Tao Wang ()
Additional contact information
Tae-Hwy Lee: Department of Economics, University of California Riverside
Tao Wang: University of Victoria
No 202412, Working Papers from University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics
Abstract:
We in this paper employ a penalized moment selection procedure to identify valid and relevant moments for estimating and testing forecast rationality within the flexible loss framework proposed by Elliott et al. (2005). We motivate the selection of moments in a high-dimensional setting, outlining the fundamental mechanism of the penalized moment selection procedure and demonstrating its implementation in the context of forecast rationality, particularly in the presence of potentially invalid moment conditions. The selection consistency and asymptotic normality are established under conditions specifically tailored to economic forecasting. Through a series of Monte Carlo simulations, we evaluate the finite sample performance of penalized moment estimation in utilizing available instrument information effectively within both estimation and testing procedures. Additionally, we present an empirical analysis using data from the Survey of Professional Forecasters issued by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia to illustrate the practical utility of the suggested methodology. The results indicate that the proposed postselection estimator for forecaster’s attitude performs comparably to the oracle estimator by efficiently incorporating available information. The power of rationality and symmetry tests leveraging penalized moment estimation is substantially enhanced by minimizing the impact of uninformative instruments. For practitioners assessing the rationality of externally generated forecasts, such as those in the Greenbook, the proposed penalized moment selection procedure could offer a robust approach to achieve more efficient estimation outcomes.
Keywords: Forecast rationality; Moment selection; Penalized estimation; Relevance; Validity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C36 C53 E17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 Pages
Date: 2024-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ets
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://economics.ucr.edu/repec/ucr/wpaper/202412.pdf First version, 2024 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucr:wpaper:202412
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kelvin Mac ().