On the futility of criticizing Simon´s rational choice model

Gustavo Marqués () and Diego Weisman ()
Additional contact information
Gustavo Marqués: Centro de Investigación en Epistemología de las Ciencias Económicas (CIECE), Facultad de Ciencias Económicas (FCE), Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora (UNLZ).
Diego Weisman: Centro de Investigación en Epistemología de las Ciencias Económicas (CIECE), Facultad de Ciencias Económicas (FCE), Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) y Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET).

Economía, 2008, vol. 33, issue 26, 43-62

Abstract: Models of Bounded Rationality are often seen as more realistic than the traditional alternatives based on the fully-rational homo economicus, assumed by Expected Utility Theory (EUT). In his seminal paper on Bounded Rationality Simon (1955) pictured a decision maker as having computational capacities and limited information. These changes were well received by many economists who disliked the “hopelessly un-realist” flavor of based-EUT models. To put Simon (1955) in a nutshell, though real agents cannot maximize because his rationality and knowledge is bounded, they can satisfy in the sense of choosing a good (but not necessary optimal) option. This view is attractive because it is in line with commonsense and seems to be descriptively accurate, but unfortunately it lacks empirical content –or, to say the least, it certainly has less empirical content than EUT.

Keywords: Bounded rationality; satisfying; expected utility; methodology. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B4 D0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
ftp://iies.faces.ula.ve/Pdf/Revista26/Rev26Marques.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ula:econom:v:33:y:2008:i:26:p:43-62

Access Statistics for this article

Economía is currently edited by Dyanna María Ruíz Uzcátegui and Yibeli Emilia Briceño Carrero

More articles in Economía from Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales (IIES). Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Universidad de Los Andes. Mérida, Venezuela Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales. Campus Universitario Liria, Edificio G, Tercer Nivel. Mérida 5101, Estado Mérida, Venezuela. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alexis Vásquez ().