Monitoring skin blood flow to rapidly identify alterations in tissue perfusion during fluid removal using continuous veno-venous hemofiltration in patients with circulatory shock
Wasineenart Mongkolpun,
Péter Bakos,
Jean Louis Vincent and
Jacques Creteur
ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles
Abstract:
Background: Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) can be used to reduce fluid overload and tissue edema, but excessive fluid removal may impair tissue perfusion. Skin blood flow (SBF) alters rapidly in shock, so its measurement may be useful to help monitor tissue perfusion. Methods: In a prospective, observational study in a 35-bed department of intensive care, all patients with shock who required fluid removal with CVVH were considered for inclusion. SBF was measured on the index finger using skin laser Doppler (Periflux 5000, Perimed, Järfälla, Sweden) for 3 min at baseline (before starting fluid removal, T0), and 1, 3 and 6 h after starting fluid removal. The same fluid removal rate was maintained throughout the study period. Patients were grouped according to absence (Group A) or presence (Group B) of altered tissue perfusion, defined as a 10% increase in blood lactate from T0 to T6 with the T6 lactate ≥ 1.5 mmol/l. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed and areas under the curve (AUROC) calculated to identify variables predictive of altered tissue perfusion. Data are reported as medians [25th–75th percentiles]. Results: We studied 42 patients (31 septic shock, 11 cardiogenic shock); median SOFA score at inclusion was 9 [8–12]. At T0, there were no significant differences in hemodynamic variables, norepinephrine dose, lactate concentration, ScvO2 or ultrafiltration rate between groups A and B. Cardiac index and MAP did not change over time, but SBF decreased in both groups (p
Keywords: Hemodialysis; Lactate concentration; Laser flowmetry; Microcirculation; Peripheral perfusion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-12
Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in: Annals of intensive care (2021) v.11 n° 1
Downloads: (external link)
https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/344642/1/doi_328286.pdf Full text for the whole work, or for a work part (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/344642
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://hdl.handle.ne ... lb.ac.be:2013/344642
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().