Does Federal Preclearance Make a Difference? Examining the Effects of Shelby on the Minority Voting Gap and Countermobilization

Brendan Cirillo () and Jeffrey Milyo
Additional contact information
Brendan Cirillo: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, https://ibs.colorado.edu/people/brendan-cirillo/

No 2602, Working Papers from Department of Economics, University of Missouri

Abstract: In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the Supreme Court suspended federal preclearance restrictions on changes to voting laws in several states with a history of racial or ethnic discrimination and disparities in voting. We analyze the impact of removing federal preclearance of state election reforms on minority voter turnout by estimating the triple difference in minority versus non-minority turnout in affected and unaffected states before and after Shelby. We employ data from the 2008-2024 Cooperative Election Study, which includes both validated voter turnout and registration, as well as several measures of political mobilization. We find no evidence that the end of federal preclearance has had detrimental effects on minority voter turnout or registration. We also show that revised federal preclearance procedures in the proposed John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act are not better targeted at states where minority voting retrogressed after Shelby. Finally, we do not find support for the hypothesis that countermobilization among minority voters mitigates or confounds what would otherwise have been an increase in the minority voting gap post-Shelby.

Keywords: Disparities; Election Administration; Election Law; Political Mobilization; Voter Turnout. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D71 D72 H11 K16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-mid
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NfdjqJobKGl4PviIF ... /view?usp=drive_link (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:umc:wpaper:2602

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economics, University of Missouri Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chao Gu ().