Toward an Analytical Framework for National Innovation System

Gu Shulin
Additional contact information
Gu Shulin: United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies

No 1996-05, UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series from United Nations University - INTECH

Abstract: This paper reports on the preliminary development of a conceptual framework for national innovation systems, with a special reference to the problems and difficulties currently faced by developing countries in their industrial developments, in the circumstances of economic globalization and liberalization. This is an effort aimed at elaborating an analytic instrument focusing central attention on endogenous capability building in relation to national technology policy issues. The first section of the paper presents an outline conceptualization of national innovation systems, emphasizing that learning, learning efficiency, and the institutional context of learning constitute a coherent core of the approach of a national innovation system. It is argued that the concept of these core elements is sensitive to the unique features of industrially underdeveloped countries in recognizing (1) the indispensability of building and restructuring institutions throughout the modernization process, and (2) the distinctive and complex role of government policy in compensating for inadequately developed market mechanisms, and in inducing institutional transformation. The second part of the paper highlights some essential aspects of the approach to research suggested by the concept of a national innovation system, through illustrating issues and methods confronted under the headings of: 1) distinguishing between development stages; 2) industrial structure and learning; 3) institutional set-up and learning; 4) the market mechanism, opening to the world, and learning; 5) economic reform, path-shifting and policy learning; and 6) institutional and technological analysis. It demonstrates that while the concept remains about national competitiveness and national specificity, the focus for analysis using this concept is on micro-level events. It is at lower levels that the delicate mechanisms of interactive technological, institutional, and policy learning work. The thrust of the discussion in the second section, although the issues and methods illustrated are by themselves more pertinent to countries in which certain institutions and technological capabilities have been established, points to the importance of carefully identifying critical issues before applying the analytical approach of a national innovation system.

Keywords: Innovations; National Policy; Industrial Development; Globalization; Developing Countries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/discussion-papers/9605.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (https://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/discussion-papers/9605.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://unu.edu/merit-domain-redirect/publications/discussion-papers/9605.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:unm:unuint:199605

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series from United Nations University - INTECH Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ad Notten ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).