 Biodiversity and the Design of Result-based Payments: Evidence from GermanySergei Schaub (), Alexander Pfaff () and Petyo Bonev () No 2502, Economics Working Paper Series from University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science Abstract: Paying farmers for measured outcomes – i.e., results, not actions - is promoted for reducing risk and raising flexibility in addressing agriculture’s environmental damages. One key design choice is how exactly to reward those measured results. Continuous rewards are possible yet, in practice, observed species outcomes have been rewarded using a single threshold (compliant/not) or, to move toward continuity, a few thresholds (e.g., low-medium-high). We assess whether more continuous rewards – specifically, multiple target thresholds for plant species - raised bird diversity. We study a pilot scheme in Germany’s Lower Saxony, where an incentive with one threshold is the baseline. Using citizen-science bird data (offering over 6.7m entries across 16 years), we find that the pilot scheme using multiple target thresholds for plant species raised bird diversity versus the single-threshold baseline (same lower threshold, but no further thresholds). Our findings show potential for benefits from even small shifts in incentive designs. Keywords: Agricultural policy; Policy design; Agri-environmental payments; Results-based payments; Biodiversity; Birds (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:usg:econwp:2025:02 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Economics Working Paper Series from University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.