EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Impact of Risk Report Formats on Investment Analyst Decisions: An Experimental Case from Indonesia

Negina Kencono Putri () and Triani Arofah
Additional contact information
Negina Kencono Putri: Accounting Department, Jenderal Soedirman University, HR. Boenyamin 708, Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia
Triani Arofah: Accounting Department, Jenderal Soedirman University, HR. Boenyamin 708, Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia

Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), 2013, vol. 9, issue 1, 89-112

Abstract: This study aims to examine the impact on investment decisions of risk information reported by banking companies in Indonesia pursuant to Indonesia SFAS 60, adopted from IFRS 7. The standard requires banking companies in Indonesia to prepare a complete report (qualitative and quantitative) either in the format of a risk-sensitivity analysis, as a value at risk, or in a tabular format. This study was conducted utilising an on-line field experimental method with 3 × 2 mixed designs that involved 54 investment analysts as participants. The experiment was conducted to test whether different formats of risk information influence the investment decision-making process. The results showed that participants have confidence in making investments when the risk information presented is in a complete risk format. This is shown by a positive and significant increase in confidence when participants analyse the complete risk information compared to risk information that is presented in a qualitative form only. The findings also showed a difference when risk information is presented in a tabular format compared to risk information presented in a sensitivity analysis or a value at risk format. Most participants chose the tabular format because it is considered more informative and thought to improve the reasoning of the investment analysis.

Keywords: Indonesia SFAS 60; risk information; sensitivity analysis; value at risk; tabular format (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://web.usm.my/journal/aamjaf/vol%209-1-2013/Art%205%20%2889-112%29.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:usm:journl:aamjaf00901_89-112

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF) from Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Division, Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:usm:journl:aamjaf00901_89-112