EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Is Remote Working Effective in the Public Utility Sector? The Perspective of Resource Allocation in Administrative and Civil Services

Kam Aygun (), Przygodzki Zbigniew () and Trippner-Hrabi Justyna ()
Additional contact information
Kam Aygun: Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Local Government Economics, University of Lodz, Poland
Przygodzki Zbigniew: Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Local Government Economics, University of Lodz, Poland
Trippner-Hrabi Justyna: Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Local Government Economics, University of Lodz, Poland

Journal of Intercultural Management, 2023, vol. 15, issue 4, 5-38

Abstract: Objectives (1) assessing the effectiveness of resource allocation in the public utility sector groups during remote work, (2) examining the efficiency of remote work compared to stationary work from the entire public utility organization point of view. Methodology To operationalize the research aim, ten research questions (RQ1-RQ9) and a research hypothesis (H1) were prepared for the identification of the effectiveness of resource allocation (Table 1). H1. If remote work improves time management effectiveness for daily tasks, employees are willing to invest their resources to work remotely. Research question RQ10 was prepared to achieve this goal, and the second hypothesis (H2) was formulated. H2. Remote working reduces public utility sector institutions’ resource consumption (utility expenses). Findings (1) remote work requirements do not occupy a significant portion of annual budgets for public utility services, (2) remote work allows reducing the fixed costs of maintaining stationary working in the short term, (3) even if remote work is a cost-effective method for public utility services and decreases indirect employee costs, it has yet to be incorporated successfully. Value added: Consequently, remote work saves resources and is cost-effective for employers. It lowers indirect employee costs (real tax deductible costs) in terms of utility expenses because employees work out of their institutions’ premises in civil and administrative services. In addition, the employer does not finance the psychological and physiological needs of employees adapting to remote work in both services. Recommendations Future research will be essential to assess whether remote work applications have improved in the public utility sector in this regard. Additionally, it would be best practice to conduct a study with a similar research concept in the private sector to compare findings and implementation strategies and offer solutions to the challenges caused by remote work.

Keywords: remote working; effectiveness of public utility service; efficiency of public utility service; civil service; administrative service; Belbin’s Team roles; Jung’s personality types concept (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2023-0016 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:5-38:n:1

DOI: 10.2478/joim-2023-0016

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Intercultural Management is currently edited by Łukasz Sułkowski

More articles in Journal of Intercultural Management from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:5-38:n:1