Economic Incentives in the Hospice Care Setting: A Comparison of For-profit and Nonprofit Providers
Dana Forgione and
Kelly Noe
No 19195, Working Paper Series from Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to examine the association of differences in economic incentives between for-profit (FP) and nonprofit (NP) hospice care providers with management performance using financial and nonfinancial metrics. This research is based on the expectations of Agency theory and applies proxies of the quality of patient care while controlling for differences in cost-efficiency. Our findings indicate that FP hospice providers (1) selectively admit patients with longer life-prognoses and billable days and hence lower average costs per day (2) employ a lower average cost/skill mix of workers and (3) have higher CEO compensation and profit. The NP providers admit more patients with the less profitable life-prognoses attributes have lower CEO compensation and reinvest their net earnings under the non-distribution constraint. While the profit incentive may be needed to attract providers into this rapidly growing and underserved market the NP providers return a lower cost per patient served from the taxpayer's perspective.
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/19195
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vuw:vuwcsr:19195
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series from Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation ISCR, PO Box 600, Victoria University Wellington 6140, New Zealand. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Library Technology Services ().