Environmental and Distortionary Taxes: Comment

William K. Jaeger ()
Additional contact information
William K. Jaeger: Williams College

No 2001-12, Department of Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics, Williams College

Abstract: This note argues that the conclusions and inferences in a recent literature on second-best environmental taxation are due to the use of a particular definition of "marginal social damage," one that is not based on the marginal rate of substitution between income and the environment for the social planner's problem. In particular, the definition used values an incremental unit of income in a way that does not reflect its Pareto efficient use. When the definition of marginal social damage from pollution is based on the social marginal rate of substitution between income and environmental quality, the optimal environmental tax is found to exceed marginal social damage in a second-best setting with revenue-raising taxes. Since, in the first-best case with no binding revenue requirement, the optimal environmental tax equals marginal social damage, it follows directly that the optimal environmental tax rises with increasing and binding revenue requirements over the range under consideration.

Date: 2001-02
Note: full text not available
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wil:wileco:2001-12

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Department of Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics, Williams College Williamstown, MA 01267. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Greg Phelan ().