A Discussion of “Audit Review: Managers' Interpersonal Expectations and Conduct of the Reviewâ€

Mark E. Peecher

Contemporary Accounting Research, 2002, vol. 19, issue 3, 445-448

Abstract: Gibbins and Trotman's study both explores reviewer attributes that auditors judge to influence review quality and replicates earlier, largely experimental findings about preparer and reviewer decision behavior. Such exploration and intra†method replication create opportunities to refine theory and better design future experimental and nonexperimental studies. Naturally, as with any study, the opportunities that this study creates are not without bounds. To help in thinking about these bounded opportunities, this discussion raises four topics that I have entitled “retro†spective biases†, “stylization perceptions†, “manager styles†, and “real†time review complexities†. After discussing these topics in turn, I end with a short summary.

Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1506/MATF-R1MP-LC97-BJW4

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:coacre:v:19:y:2002:i:3:p:445-448

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Contemporary Accounting Research from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().