Cost‐effectiveness with multiple outcomes

Jakob Bjørner and Hans Keiding

Health Economics, 2004, vol. 13, issue 12, 1181-1190

Abstract: In a large number of situations, activities in health care have to be measured in terms of outcome and cost. However, the cases where outcome is fully captured by a single measure are rather few, so that one uses some index for outcome, computed by weighing together several outcome measures using subjective and somewhat arbitrary weights. In the paper we propose an approach to cost‐effectiveness analysis where such artificial aggregation is avoided. This is achieved by assigning to each activity the weights which are the most favourable in a comparison with the other options available, so that activities which have a poor score in this method are guaranteed to be inferior. The method corresponds to applying Data envelopment analysis, known from the theory of productivity, to the context of health economic evaluations. The method is applied to an analysis of the cost‐effectiveness of alternative health plans using data from the Medical Outcome Study (JAMA 1996; 276: 1039–1047), where outcome is measured as improvement in mental and physical health. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.900

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:12:p:1181-1190

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().