Sorting into payment schemes and medical treatment: A laboratory experiment

Jeannette Brosig‐Koch, Nadja Kairies‐Schwarz and Johanna Kokot

Health Economics, 2017, vol. 26, issue S3, 52-65

Abstract: In this study, we introduce the opportunity for physicians to sort into capitation or fee‐for‐service payment. Using a controlled medically framed laboratory experiment with a sequential within‐subject design allows isolating sorting from incentive effects. We observe a strong preference for fee‐for‐service payment, which does not depend on subjects' prior experience with one of the two payment schemes. Further, we identify a significant sorting effect. Subjects choosing capitation deviate ex ante less from patient‐optimal medical treatment than subjects who sort into fee‐for‐service payment. Particularly the latter become even less patient‐oriented after introducing the choice option. Consequently, the opportunity to choose between fee‐for‐service and capitation payment worsens patient treatment, if at all. Our results hold for medical and for nonmedical students.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3616

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:26:y:2017:i:s3:p:52-65

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().