Appraising the use of contingent valuation: A note in response

Julia Fox‐Rushby

Health Economics, 1993, vol. 2, issue 4, 361-362

Abstract: This paper reviews the guidelines and recommendations propounded by Morrison and Gyldmark in relation to the use of contingent valuation (CV) to value health states. The issues raised are: that QALYs may not be sufficiently sensitive to changes in health thus requiring the use of CV formulation; the questionable practice of reinterpreting monetary values; and the possibility of income bias. It is concluded that further empirical research, at least, is needed to verify whether this approach should be rejected in favour of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) or healthy year equivalents (HYEs).

Date: 1993
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4730020409

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:2:y:1993:i:4:p:361-362

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().