Ratio‐based and net benefit‐based approaches to health care resource allocation: proofs of optimality and equivalence

Eugene M. Laska, Morris Meisner, Carole Siegel and Aaron A. Stinnett

Health Economics, 1999, vol. 8, issue 2, 171-174

Abstract: Both incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios and net benefits have been proposed as summary measures for use in cost‐effectiveness analyses. We present a unifying proof of the optimality and equivalence of ICER‐ and net benefit‐based approaches to the health resource allocation problem, including both ‘fixed budget’ and ‘fixed price’ decision rules. If internally consistent willingness‐to‐pay values are used, ratio‐ and net benefit‐based decision rules identify the same optimal allocation. Because they have identical resource allocation implications, use of one or other of the two approaches must be based on other criteria, such as their behaviour under conditions of uncertainty. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199903)8:23.0.CO;2-E

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:8:y:1999:i:2:p:171-174

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().