Fieller's method and net health benefits

Daniel F. Heitjan

Health Economics, 2000, vol. 9, issue 4, 327-335

Abstract: Statistical and conceptual difficulties complicate the estimation of the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER). An alternative approach is to measure cost‐effectiveness by the incremental net health benefit (INHB), defined as the difference in mean effectiveness of a new treatment compared with a standard, adjusted for cost difference by subtracting the health foregone if purchasing care at the rate of a marginally cost‐effective therapy. Because net health benefit (NHB) is dependent on this threshold rate, one can construct confidence intervals for the INHB at various values of the rate. It turns out that the set of rates where new and standard are not significantly different is equal to the Fieller's method confidence set for the ICER. We review the derivation of the Fieller's method confidence set, present numerical examples, and discuss the implications of our result for the calculation and interpretation of NHB analyses. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1050(200006)9:43.0.CO;2-S

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:327-335

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().