Determinants of ambulatory treatment mode for mental illness

Marc P. Freiman and Samuel H. Zuvekas

Health Economics, 2000, vol. 9, issue 5, 423-434

Abstract: We estimate a reduced‐form bivariate probit model to analyse jointly the choice of ambulatory treatment from the specialty mental health sector and/or the use of psychotropic drugs for a nationally representative sample of US household residents. We find significant differences in treatment choice by education, gender, race and ethnicity, while controlling for several aspects of self‐reported mental health and treatment attitudes. For example, while women are more likely than men to use the specialty mental health sector and more likely to take psychotropic medications, this difference between men and women is much greater for psychotropic medications. The estimated differences may reflect patient preferences in a manner traditionally assumed when interpreting these coefficients in such equations, but we discuss how they may also reflect biases and misperceptions on the parts of patients and providers. We also discuss how our results relate to some findings and policies in the general health care sector. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1050(200007)9:53.0.CO;2-X

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:5:p:423-434

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().