Efficiency of single‐stock futures: An intraday analysis
Joseph K.W. Fung and
Yiuman Tse
Journal of Futures Markets, 2008, vol. 28, issue 6, 518-536
Abstract:
Using intraday bid–ask quotes of single‐stock futures (SSFs) contracts and the underlying stocks, the pricing and informational efficiency of SSF traded on the Hong Kong Exchange are examined. Both the SSFs and the stocks are traded on electronic platforms. The market microstructure and the data obviate the problems of stale and non‐executable prices as well as uncertain bid–ask bounce of the thinly traded futures contracts. Nominal price comparisons show that more than 80% of SSF quotes are inferior to stock quotes. More than 99% of the observed futures spreads are above one stock tick compared with only 2% of those for stocks. After adjusting for the cost‐of‐carry, however, SSFs are fairly priced. Given higher stock trading costs, non‐members should even find the futures attractively priced. Thus, the absence of competitive market maker does not bias prices so as to discourage trading. SSF quotes also account for one‐third of price discovery despite their low volume. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 28:518–536, 2008
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:28:y:2008:i:6:p:518-536
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0270-7314
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Futures Markets is currently edited by Robert I. Webb
More articles in Journal of Futures Markets from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().