Womens’ opinions on intrapartal care: development of a theory‐based questionnaire

Bodil Wilde‐Larsson, Gerry Larsson, Linda J Kvist and Ann‐Kristin Sandin‐Bojö

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2010, vol. 19, issue 11‐12, 1748-1760

Abstract: Aim. To develop a patient questionnaire specific to intrapartal care, based on the theoretical foundation of the general instrument Quality from the Patient’s Perspective (QPP). Background. Existing general patient questionnaires do not take intrapartal care aspects fully into account, and available intrapartal‐specific patient questionnaires tend to have a weak theoretical foundation. Design. A cross‐sectional, nationwide study carried out during a two‐week period in 2007 at Swedish maternity units. Method. An intrapartal‐specific QPP‐questionnaire (QPP‐I) was developed by combining a selection of 22 items from the short and long versions of the QPP with 10 newly constructed items. Responses were obtained from 739 women (63% response rate). The dimensionality of the QPP‐I was assessed using structural equation modelling (a nested factor model). Non‐parametric statistics were used for subgroup comparisons. Results. A nested model with a general factor including all 32 items and 10 subordinate factors was developed. Most scales had acceptable reliability coefficients (0·73–0·93), and a meaningful pattern of subgroup differences was obtained. Conclusions. The QPP‐I is theory based and has its roots in a patient perspective. It was developed using a nationwide sample of Swedish women receiving intrapartal care, and an advanced statistical method was used. The outcome of this initial empirical trial was promising but needs to be tested in different countries and cultures. Relevance to clinical practice. By combining womens’ responses on perceived reality and subjective importance ascribed to the various aspects of care measured, the QPP‐I offers the care provider better guidelines on which elements to focus quality improvement work on, than would be the case if only a rank order of perceived reality ratings was available.

Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03055.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1748-1760

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().