Routines and rituals: a grounded theory of the pain management of drug users in acute care settings

May McCreaddie, Imogen Lyons, Debbie Watt, Elspeth Ewing, Jeanette Croft, Marion Smith and Jennifer Tocher

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2010, vol. 19, issue 19‐20, 2730-2740

Abstract: Aim. This study reviewed the perceptions and strategies of drug users and nurses with regard to pain management in acute care settings. Background. Drug users present unique challenges in acute care settings with pain management noted to be at best suboptimal, at worst non‐existent. Little is known about why and specifically how therapeutic effectiveness is compromised. Design. Qualitative: constructivist grounded theory Method. A constructivist grounded theory approach incorporating a constant comparative method of data collection and analysis was applied. The data corpus comprised interviews with drug users (n = 11) and five focus groups (n = 22) of nurses and recovering drug users. Results. Moral relativism as the core category both represents the phenomenon and explains the basic social process. Nurses and drug users struggle with moral relativism when addressing the issue of pain management in the acute care setting. Drug users lay claim to expectations of compassionate care and moralise via narration. Paradoxically, nurses report that the caring ideal and mutuality of caring are diminished. Drug users’ individual sensitivities, anxieties and felt stigma in conjunction with opioid‐induced hyperalgesia complicate the processes. Nurses’ and hospitals’ organisational routines challenge drug user rituals and vice versa leading both protagonists to become disaffected. Consequently, key clinical issues such as preventing withdrawal and managing pain are left unaddressed and therapeutic effectiveness is compromised. Conclusion. This study provides a robust account of nurses’ and drug users’ struggle with pain management in the acute care setting. Quick technological fixes such as urine screens, checklists or the transient effects of (cognitive‐based) education (or training) are not the answer. This study highlights the need for nurses to engage meaningfully with this perceptibly ‘difficult’ group of patients. Relevance to clinical practice. The key aspects likely to contribute to problematic interactions with this patient cohort are outlined so that they can be prevented and, or addressed.

Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03284.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:19-20:p:2730-2740

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().