Attitudes to the use of seclusion: has contemporary mental health policy made a difference?

Brenda Happell and Stefan Koehn

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2010, vol. 19, issue 21‐22, 3208-3217

Abstract: Background. The use of seclusion in mental health services is controversial, and recent Government policy has identified the reduction and, if possible, elimination of seclusion as a national safety priority. As the professional group most likely to initiate seclusion, the attitudes of nurses will influence the extent to which policy translates to practice. Design. The Survey of Nurses’ Attitudes to Seclusion Survey was completed by nurses (n = 123) from eight mental health services from Queensland, Australia. Methods. Data were analysed using SPSS to provide descriptive statistics for nurses’ attitudes according to the scale. Correlation analysis was used to examine associations between demographic variables and attitudes towards seclusion. Results. Participants recognised the negative impact of seclusion on consumers; however, they continue to support its use, particularly in cases of threatened or actual violence to staff and other consumers. The impact of seclusion room on consumers was viewed as significant and yet most participants did not recommend changes other than painting the room for a calming effect. Demographic factors had limited impact on attitudes. Conclusions. The continued support of the use of seclusion despite acknowledgement of its detrimental effects appears to reflect a lack of alternative approaches to the management of consumer behaviours such as violence and aggression. Relevance to clinical practice. While nurses continue to view seclusion as a necessary intervention, the success of strategies aimed at reducing its use will be limited. The implementation and evaluation of alternative approaches to the care of consumers is necessary to reduce reliance and seclusion and introduce changes to practice.

Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03286.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:3208-3217

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().