Family Companionship: How Does Superstition Improve Mental Health?

Yuhao Dai and Qican Wu

Managerial and Decision Economics, 2025, vol. 46, issue 6, 3269-3282

Abstract: A large amount of literature has proved that zodiac year superstition has a significant impact on business behaviors such as risk‐taking, investment return, and insurance purchase, but the literature on the relationship between zodiac year and psychological state is still limited. This paper draws on epidemiological strategies to construct its research strategy, using data from China to explore the relationship between zodiac years and individual psychological states. Our findings suggest that their mental state improves when a person's family members enter the zodiac. Our empirical regression reveals the mediating mechanism, with collectivism and family cohesion, which belong to the same traditional Chinese culture as the zodiac year, playing an important role. When family members enter the zodiac year, individuals in the zodiac year will reduce their risk preference due to the vigilance of “misfortune” caused by zodiac year superstition. Under the action of collectivism and family cohesion, risks will also be passed through the generations, resulting in the convergence of risk preferences within the family. On the other hand, due to the essential requirements of collectivism and family cohesion, individuals in the zodiac year will reduce their risk preference. Out of concern for the “unlucky” individuals in zodiacal years, other members will choose to go out less and spend more time together and in each other's company. Interactions between family members make them feel less alone, and their mental state improves. These results suggest that cultural beliefs influence individual mental health through collectivism and family cohesion.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4530

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:6:p:3269-3282

Access Statistics for this article

Managerial and Decision Economics is currently edited by Antony Dnes

More articles in Managerial and Decision Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().