EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Two‐echelon distribution systems with random demands and storage constraints

Awi Federgruen, C. Daniel Guetta and Garud Iyengar

Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 2018, vol. 65, issue 8, 594-618

Abstract: We consider a general two‐echelon distribution system consisting of a depot and multiple sales outlets, henceforth referred to as retailers, which face random demands for a given item. The replenishment process consists of two stages: the depot procures the item from an outside supplier, while the retailers' inventories are replenished by shipments from the depot. Both of the replenishment stages are associated with a given facility‐specific leadtime. The depot as well as the retailers faces a limited inventory capacity. Inventories are reviewed and orders are placed on a periodic basis. When a retailer runs out of stock, unmet demand is backlogged. We propose a new approach to the above class of dynamic programming models based on Lagrangian relaxation. Every choice of the vector of Lagrange multipliers generates a lower bound via the solution of a single dynamic program (DP) with a one‐dimensional state‐space. The best such bound is obtained by maximizing over the vector of multipliers. The strategy that is optimal for this (maximal) lower bound DP employs an (s, S) ordering policy (generally, with time‐dependent policy parameters). To arrive at an upper bound and an implementable heuristic, this (s, S) policy is paired with one of several possible allocation policies that allocate the system‐wide inventory across the different facilities. We report on an extensive numerical study with close to 14 000 instances which evaluates the accuracy of the lower bound and the optimality gap of the various heuristic policies. The study reveals that the lower bound and the heuristic strategy that is constructed on its basis perform exceedingly well, almost across the entire parameter spectrum, including instances where demands are rather volatile or the average cycle time between consecutive orders is relatively large. The exception arises when storage at the depot is as expensive as at the retailer level and the retailers have large storage capacities.

Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21825

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:navres:v:65:y:2018:i:8:p:594-618

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Naval Research Logistics (NRL) from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:65:y:2018:i:8:p:594-618