From phase transitions to Modern Monetary Theory: A framework for analyzing the pandemic of 2020

Bluford H. Putnam

Review of Financial Economics, 2021, vol. 39, issue 1, 3-19

Abstract: Analyzing the economic impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic of 2020 requires an appreciation that price signals were no longer primary determinants of supply and demand. Economic agents were acting out of health fears, government‐mandated shutdown rules, and dealing with financial distress. The economy had entered a state that was far from equilibrium. Orthodox tools, such as comparative equilibrium analysis, can tell one about state “A” and state “B,” but provide no guidance as to how to analyze the phase transition. We turn to the physics of phase transitions to help us understand what essentially was a network collapse. The analysis is extended to examine whether the initial policy responses were more likely to cushion the blow or to accelerate the eventual economic recovery, which is extended into an examination of Modern Monetary Theory. Finally, we study the behavioral changes induced by the pandemic that are likely to be long‐lasting and impact the pace of the recovery. And we note a variety of data anomalies that are sure to vex empirical researchers as they study the pandemic of 2020.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1122

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:revfec:v:39:y:2021:i:1:p:3-19

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Financial Economics from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().