Adaptive Models and the Power of the Incumbent

Scott de Marchi

Research in Economics from Santa Fe Institute

Abstract: The spatial model of voting is a benchmark in theories purporting to explain political behavior. Yet, evidence against the accuracy of both the assumptions and predictions of the spatial model is accumulating in the scholarly literature. One long-held result of spatial theory is that incumbents always lose elections to challengers. Despite the fact that empirical returns fail to confirm the finding, political science has not been able to explain why there exists such a glaring difference between theory and actual returns. In large part, spatial theory's failure to illuminate problems of this kind stems from its reliance upon an unrealistic model of human cognition: substantive rationality. By assuming that political actors possess complete information, formal theoretic approaches have discarded the central dynamic of potential choice. This proposal will offer an alternative approach that seeks to model agents (parties and voters) as limited information processors. Complexity theory provides a framework to model the use of information by political actors and has been utilized in this paper to build a simulation of elections that provides an explanation for why incumbents fare so well on election day. The results not only illuminate the nature of the incumbency, but also argue for a new focus on the role of information in political choice.

Keywords: attention; cognition; complexity theory; electoral; incumbency; voting behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wop:safire:97-06-058e

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research in Economics from Santa Fe Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().