IMPACT OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM AND ITS SUBCOMPONENTS ON COMMERCIAL BANKS’ RISK-TAKING

Faisal Abbas (), Shoaib Ali and Wing-Keung Wong
Additional contact information
Faisal Abbas: UCP Business School, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), 2022, vol. 17, issue 03, 1-30

Abstract: We hypothesize that both liberalization and economic freedom are double-edged swords for the banking industry because they can increase both stability and fragility of the banks. To test our hypotheses, we use the two-step GMM technique to examine the impact of economic freedom and the impacts of all of its sub-components on the risk-taking behavior of US commercial banks for the period from 2003 to 2019. We find that economic freedom adversely affects banks’ risks, and therefore, increases the stability of the banking system. We observe that not all types of freedoms have positive outcomes in the banking sector, both investment and trade-related deregulation increase the fragility of the banking sector, and any type of relaxation in which banks play a direct role has a negative influence on the characteristics of banks like capital control or trade. Consistent with the competition stability theory, our findings conclude that higher economic freedom will yield higher stability in the US commercial banks. Whereas our findings are heterogeneous across all of its sub-components, all the sub-components expect investment and trade freedom positively influence the banks’ stability. Additionally, the result of this study remains consistent across well-, and under-capitalized banks, and the outcome of this study remains robust to the alternative measures of risk. Regulators, policymakers and bank managers could draw implications from the results in this paper in deciding how much liberalization the banks can handle and they also must consider the heterogeneity in the impacts from all of the sub-components because not all of them generate favorable outcomes for banks.

Keywords: Economic freedom; bank risk; US commercial banks; banks’ stability and fragility; the two-step GMM technique (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2010495222500221
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:afexxx:v:17:y:2022:i:03:n:s2010495222500221

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S2010495222500221

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Financial Economics (AFE) is currently edited by Michael McAleer

More articles in Annals of Financial Economics (AFE) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().