AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING IN SUPPORTING SHARE VALUES IN FTSE100 COMPANIES

James Daniel Walmsley () and Alan Bond ()
Additional contact information
James Daniel Walmsley: EIA Centre, School of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Alan Bond: School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), 2003, vol. 05, issue 02, 149-182

Abstract: This paper explores the relationship between corporate environmental reporting and share price performance amongst companies in two industry groups listed on the UK FTSE (Financial Times Stock Exchange) 100 as of the 30th July 2001. The hypothesis tested is that the production of good quality corporate environmental reports (CERs) benefits company share price, by demonstrating to investors an awareness of risk, liability, legislation and opportunities as well as providing a collection of policy, impacts, temporal trends, targets and commitment.Some other studies in this area have concluded that a positive relationship exists between corporate environmental management and performance (including environmental reporting) and share value. The results of this paper differ however, and show that on average, the production of environmental reports by FTSE100 companies (in the energy and utilities and financial services sectors) has not lead to improved historical share price performance when compared to non-reporting companies, although there is strong evidence for reduced volatility of share price. Results for sector performance varied from those obtained from individual company level. The two companies assessed as producing the best reports in their industry sector outperformed both the FTSE100 benchmark, and many of their competitors for the five-year period studied.Whilst there are many benefits to be gained by listed companies through environmental reporting, such as enhancing image and improving public and investor opinion, a positive attitude to the environment, as demonstrated through environmental reporting, can provide an indication of a truly strategic approach to business. Yet there are so many factors involved, it is not possible from the results to conclude that environmental reporting supports share value.

Keywords: Corporate environmental reporting; corporate social responsibility; ethical investing; ftse4good; share value; content analysis; financial performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333203001334
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:05:y:2003:i:02:n:s1464333203001334

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1464333203001334

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) is currently edited by Thomas Fischer

More articles in Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().