HARD TURNING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING CVD AND PVD COATED CARBIDE TOOLS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Rajashree Mallick, Ramanuj Kumar, Amlana Panda and Ashok Kumar Sahoo
Additional contact information
Rajashree Mallick: School of Mechanical Engineering, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT), Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar-751024, India
Ramanuj Kumar: School of Mechanical Engineering, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT), Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar-751024, India
Amlana Panda: School of Mechanical Engineering, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT), Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar-751024, India
Ashok Kumar Sahoo: School of Mechanical Engineering, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT), Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar-751024, India

Surface Review and Letters (SRL), 2022, vol. 29, issue 02, 1-17

Abstract: This study emphasizes the comparative cutting performance evaluation of CVD- and PVD-coated carbide inserts in hard turning of AISI D2 steel. The cutting factors, namely cutting speed (100m/min), tool feed rate (0.08mm/rev), and depth of cut 0.2mm, have been fixed for the entire study. The comparative study is based on the analysis of the obtained test results of flank wear, tool life, auxiliary flank wear, surface roughness, and surface texture. Both tools are catastrophically failed when tool wear reached limiting flank wear (VBc=0.3mm) criteria. SEM and EDS analysis of both the tools (at their end of tool life) are carried. Diffusion followed by adhesion is found to be the prime mechanism at the end of tool life. Based on limiting flank wear criteria, the tool life of CVD and PVD tools was estimated as 65 and 57min, respectively, i.e. the tool life of the CVD tool is 14% longer than that of the PVD tool. Considering the limiting criteria of surface roughness (Ra=1.6μm), the tool life of the CVD tool was estimated as 63min while for the PVD tool, it was found as 54min i.e. about 14.3% higher tool life was found for the CVD tool relative to the PVD tool. The auxiliary flank wear was observed to be lower for the CVD tool relative to the PVD tool. Surface roughness for both the tools increased with cutting time and the relatively larger rough surface was obtained with the PVD tool. The machining cost of one pass of the CVD tool is 2.5% less than that of the PVD tool. However, for mass production, the CVD tool is more efficient than the PVD tool for machining hard D2 steel (57±1 HRC).

Keywords: Hard turning; CVD; PVD; flank wear; surface roughness; surface texture; cost of machining (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0218625X22500202
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:srlxxx:v:29:y:2022:i:02:n:s0218625x22500202

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0218625X22500202

Access Statistics for this article

Surface Review and Letters (SRL) is currently edited by S Y Tong

More articles in Surface Review and Letters (SRL) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().