Pragmatic Holism

Bruce Edmonds

No 96-08, Discussion Papers from Manchester Metropolitan University, Centre for Policy Modelling

Abstract: The reductionist/holist debate seems an impoverished one, with many participants appearing to adopt a position first and constructing rationalisations second. Here I propose an intermediate position of pragmatic holism, that irrespective of whether all natural systems are theoretically reducible, for many systems it is completely impractical to attempt such a reduction, also that regardless if whether irreducible `wholes' exist, it is vain to try and prove this in absolute terms. This position thus illuminates the debate along new pragmatic lines, and refocusses attention on the underlying heuristics of learning about the natural world.

Date: 1996-02-21
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.fmb.mmu.ac.uk:80/~bruce/praghol/praghol.txt (text/plain)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.fmb.mmu.ac.uk:80 (No such host is known. )

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wuk:mcpmdp:008

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Manchester Metropolitan University, Centre for Policy Modelling Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by WoPEc Project ().