The influence of gender-stereotyped perfumes on the attribution of leadership competence

Sabine Sczesny (), Sandra Spreemann () and Dagmar Stahlberg ()
Additional contact information
Sabine Sczesny: Lehrstuhl fuer Sozialpsychologie der Universitaet Mannheim, Postal: Seminargebaeude A5, D-68131 Mannheim
Sandra Spreemann : Lehrstuhl fuer Sozialpsychologie der Universitaet Mannheim, Postal: Seminargebaeude A5, D-68131 Mannheim
Dagmar Stahlberg: Lehrstuhl fuer Sozialpsychologie, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Postal: Seminargebaeude A5, D-68131 Mannheim

No 01-02, Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications from Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim

Abstract: The classification of perfumes as 'women's' and 'men's' fragrances is based on certain gender role stereotypes: 'flowery' or 'fruity' fragrances for women, 'spicy' and 'strong(tangy)' fragrances for men. Are such fragrances processed in a gender-stereotyped manner, as other sensual perceptions are? Do they affect the evaluation of persons in a professional context? Does a 'typically masculine' fragrance, in line with the phenomenon 'think manager - think male', promote the impression of competence and leadership qualities? In two experiments, female and male participants were asked to assume the role of a personnel manager. In Experiment 1, they perused an application for the position of a junior manager written by a male or female job applicant. The application papers were prepared with a typically masculine perfume, a typically feminine perfume or no perfume at all (control group). In Experiment 2, the participants conducted a job interview with a female or male applicant (a confederate) who had applied the respective perfume or no perfume. In both experiments participants stated whether they would employ the applicant and how certain they felt in their decision. In addition, they rated the applicant's general leadership competence as well as more specific leadership skills. The main findings of both experiments read as follows: (1) Compared to persons with a typically feminine perfume, persons with a typically masculine perfume were 'employed' with a higher degree of certainty. (2) Male stimulus persons with a typically masculine perfume were rated higher in general leadership competence than male persons with a typically feminine perfume, but no comparable differences were found for female stimulus persons. (3) Perfume had no effect on the rating of specific leadership skills. The results are interpreted in terms of the 'think manager - think male' phenomenon.

Pages: 37 pages
Date: 2000-08-20
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:01-02

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications from Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim Contact information at EDIRC., Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carsten Schmidt ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).