Reassessing wage-led growth in Europe: Some sceptical notes

Arne Heise

No 121, ZÖSS-Discussion Papers from University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS)

Abstract: This comment critically examines the recent claim by Alcobia and Barradas that the European Union follows a wage-led growth regime, warranting pro-labour policy intervention. While their findings support a clear policy stance, closer inspection reveals significant methodological and empirical shortcomings, including data limitations, panel heterogeneity, and questionable assumptions about causality. The paper challenges the robustness of their conclusions and questions whether functional income distribution can be effectively influenced by policy. It argues for greater theoretical caution and contextual sensitivity in policy recommendations, particularly given the unresolved ambiguities surrounding the wage- led/profit-led growth framework in diverse European economies.

Keywords: Post Keynesian economics; functional income distribution; wage-led regime research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C23 D33 E12 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec and nep-pke
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/325826/1/1936123584.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:cessdp:325826

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ZÖSS-Discussion Papers from University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().